« My Mecca | Main | Tis The Season »

While I Was Away, MLF Was At Play

I managed to sneak out of town for a couple of weeks over the holidays. I missed out on a monster snow storm (by Willamette Valley standards), got married, got the flu and enjoyed fog and rain in San Diego.

It isn’t as if the winemaking just stopped, it was still happening while I was gone. My red wines were going through the Malolactic Fermentation (MLF). This is a crucial step in the process and MLF is quite misunderstood by the wine drinking public (and in some unfortunate cases, the winemaking community as well).

The MLF is a ‘fermentation’ carried out by bacteria that convert Malic Acid into Lactic acid. Malic acid is the acid of green apples and has a very tart character. Many variables can impact levels of malic acid in grapes, notably climate, vintage, varietal, canopy management, picking decisions. Lactic acid is milk acid, is much softer and rounder than Malic acid and therefore has a ‘softening’ effect on the wine. Another important feature of the MLF is that as the Malic acid is converted to Lactic acid, the pH of the wine shifts upward ( the more Malic acid present the greater the shift, which further contributes to the softening effect but also has some other potentially undesired effects as well. This shift can also reduce color of red wines and may create an environment more favorable to spoilage organisms.

The MLF can be carried out by a vast number of bacterial species. Oenococcus is the preferred bacteria of conducting MLF and is the bacteria that is contained in most, if not all, commercial malolactic bacterial cultures. Native or Wild MLF’s may be carried out by Oenococcus or other bacteria such as pedioccus or Lactobacillus. In addition to the conversion of malic to lactic acid, the bacteria can also produce a great assortment of other molecules that may or may not impact the organoleptic qualities of the wine. One such molecule is acetic acid, the acid found in vinegar. Diacetyl is another; it generally imparts an odor commonly described as ‘buttery’. Some of the ‘wild’ bacteria produce molecules such as putracine and cadaverine, which as the names imply may not exactly be the sort of thing one wants in wine. Another class of compounds, the biogenic amines, are similar to histamine and have been known to contribute to hangovers or allergic reactions.

The concept of Malolactic fermentation entered the consumer jargon a number of years back when the Napa Valley style of Chardonnay came into prominence, the fat, buttery character of the style heavily marked by the MLF. Now many chardonnays are being touted as “no-malo” because inhibiting the MLF can maintain a brightness and edginess that would be lost if MLF were to take place. So weather or not MLF takes place in a white wine is an important winemaking descion. Generally speaking most red wines, those produced via carbonic maceration excepted, are put through the MLF to round and soften the acid-tannin structure of the wines.

Though I utilize spontaneous primary fermentations for my pinot noir, and find great returns for the risk, I do not employ spontaneous MLF’s. Part of what I attempt to do in my winemaking is reflect a sense of place, a feature easily covered up by VA (acetic acid) and the various compounds generated by the spoilage organisms that can flourish during MLF. By knowing what bacteria are conducting my MLF I feel I produce a cleaner wine that is more reflective of place. In some cases, my Rose for example, I feel are best when the MLF is inhibited. I love the zippy, tight acid structure for that wine and want to preserve it.

Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 at 12:26PM by Registered Commenter[Your Name Here] | Comments7 Comments

Reader Comments (7)

Hi Jerry

Some time back and over a period of time - I had spoken to a group of winemakers who had interacted, worked and learned from André Tchelistcheff and I asked them what they felt was his main contribution to American/California wine making. One of them mentioned that Tchelistcheff's manin contribution was the introduction/utilization of MLF.
What is your perspective on this idea?

January 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterArthur

Arthur,

There was a time when no one was aware that the changes taking place in a wine were the result of the MLF. I also suspect that the wines of that era were marked with Brett, VA, oxidation and a whole host of other flaws that I think are the result of not considering the MLF as a part of elevage. Also consider the inconsistencies that could arise from some lots or vintages being bottled with incomplete MLF ( fizzy wine ).
I think it might be fair to say that Dr. Tchelistcheff's work on MLF may have been the most important advance in winemaking in the last 100 years. It explained important changes taking place during elevage and created a marker or signal that would indicate when wine was ready to be stabilized.
For me it is simply inconceivable that a winemaker wouldn't closely track MLF and act accordingly. From my winemaking style I see the tracking of MLF and acting when appropriate as my most important job as a winemaker post harvest.
Thanks for your thoughts.

January 14, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJerry D. Murray

Thanks for clarifying, Jerry. I appreciate the additional information.

January 14, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterArthur

Jerry,

Are you of the thought that MLF is a binary decision, either on or off? As a chef, I don't make wine, but it seems to me that in tasting through barrels post primary fermentation (when different plots of the vineyard are vinified separately) that some barrels would really benefit from MLF and others would not. Were I to make a white, I would consider doing partial malo to soften a portion of the acids, depending on what I had to work with.

I guess what I'm saying is that the non-malo wines now are a knee-jerk reaction to the "California Chardonnay" that we went through a decade ago, especially knee-jerk in that in Burgundy, a lot of good whites see only partial MLF and well thought out malo has its place. Of course, see Chablis for a perfect counterexample when no malo is the rule. ;)

Ed

June 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterEd Matthews

Ed,

In my opinion MLF is a binary descion in regard to Red Wine production. A vast majority of the Red wine styles in the world utilize the MLF to round out the wines ( a result of tannins ). The Nouveau style of Beaujolais is the most obvious example of a Red not 'requiring' MLF.
White wines are another matter. I agree that with white wines there are clearly cases where a 'partial' MLF can make more balanced wines than either full or no MLF's. In this case MLF becomes more of a tool than another 'step' in the winemaking process. Winemakers that prize detail in a wine will use it in a manner much as you describe. Thanks for the comment!

June 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJerry D. Murray

Jerry,

I recently read an article that romanticized the benefits of the long cool MLF that occurred in yesteryear Europe. That, along with the resurgence of wild yeast fermentation has me thinking.
Putting aside the clear "cons" regarding spontaneous MLF, what, if any, would be the rewards? and what conditions would be most advantageous?
Thanks for your thoughts.

November 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAdam

Super great read. Honest..

May 29, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAnderson Archer

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>